Phantasies Lilith Femininity And Freedom -Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Phantasies Lilith Femininity And Freedom? Answer: Introducation Reading and thought are interlinked concepts and these two terms are two sides of one single coin. A reading anticipates a thought (Westbrook, Robert). The literary reading requires an effort which was not possible for every common man. There is a difference between the reading of a common man and a learned man. This prompts the mention of Dwight Macdonald who can be referred as the part of New York Intellectuals. He attacked the middlebrow culture and he was found to carry out his debate in the famous management. Partially he was right that there was a difference between the reading of the intellectuals and the readings of those who are not intellectuals. However this concept was not the same always in the previous times as well as the contemporary times. The essay majorly focuses on the concept of the thought and reading and produces different thoughts that are related to the literary readings. In order to establish the above mentioned thesis statement the piece of writing of Dwigh t MacDonald named` Reading and Thought` proved to be of great help in order to analyze the above mentioned concept. Apart from this the magazines like the `Times` was of great help that in order to compose the essay. According to MacDonald, Margaret there is a difference between the readings of a learned man and the readings of an uneducated man. Macdonald opined for the fact that there was a decline in the reading of literature especially among the young. The readings in literature are not acceptable to much audience. The literature is accepted only if it serves entertainment (MacDonald, marketing, Magdalena Rudkowski and Janine Hostettler Schrer). There are some instances where it has been observed that Dickens was successful in providing mass entertainment which inspired the readers to read the literature and it increased the audiences as well. The works of Dickens grabbed the attention of the people of Britain. The reading had a different meaning among the people of Britain and America. The individuals are not satisfied by the reading of the texts. The intellectual texts could not satisfy the curiosity of the audiences (LoBiondo-Wood, Geri, Judith Haber and Cherylyn Cameron). As argued by Lamb and Danielle et al, The Times and the New York Times educated people and they declared that the reading would make a person more interesting. Macdonald came up with the thought that in the sixteenth century there was little things to be read and therefore if any circumstance would arise where any individual had to go through the copy of Time or the New York Times would take an entire day to understand the matters inside it. It is because he would take time to get accustomed to the language of the matter and he would take time to think and analyze what he read. He would also take time to get use to with the language and the depth of the same (Lamb, Danielle et al). The reason behind this is the little read that was there in the golden age. However with the increasing literacy rate the increase in the reading of the contents has increased. In the article Dwight Macdonald strongly disagrees with the idea of Henry Luce of functional curiosity. According to him functiona l curiosity implies the search of the things that was going all around the world. MacDonald opines for the fact that the functional curiosity is that which only strengthens the practice of reading rather than providing information that are valuable. He commented that the literature today is inadequate and overwhelming. The reading that is done in the present world is shallow and does not involve much depth. He believes through the skimming through the text. The readers appear to be more courses, unoriginal, passive and shallow while reading the texts (Iyer-O'Sullivan and Radhika). It can be however argued that the education in today`s world is more challenging. The it is true that the advancements in the technological world is more advanced and he must consider and must give a second thought about the lifestyles of today`s education and the lifestyle of the students. There are few anecdotes that are there in the essay. The outspokenness and volubility of Macdonald`s was garnered by many detractors. He was found to be fascinated with the popular culture (McGillis and Roderick). While analyzing the film criticism of Macdonald it was observed that he had a lifelong admiration for movies and his unwillingness to overlook or overlook the mediocre standard. He made a comment where he mentioned that he would not watch a movie where the director had to learn to make movies after reading the reviews of him (Hicks, Sylvia, Shane MacDonald and Ela Martin). The writing of MacDonald is proved to be sophisticated, learned, and conversational. They are sometimes witty and they are constantly seeking the perfect judgment of situations and things. He had the capability to spear the bystander with a single phrase or a single sentence. He tried to merge the popular culture with a taste of high culture and with passionate interest. His major concern was a perceived breakdown of the traditional values of the culture. They were at the hands of the mass cultural consumption (Tinning, Richard). This was not liked by MacDonald and he was more concerned auditing the up gradation of the culture of writing. He believed in preserving the value more than the money. He was too some extent a radical and an erratic radical. It is the unresolved contradiction that made his essays a complicated and a complex one. The culture made him a better person and it became the major area of his writing and debate. He was no doubt an intellectual one and he fostered man y intellectuals. He acted as a cultural critic. He criticized the rise of the rise of the mass-media and the middle-brow (Gear, Adrienne). Therefore while analyzing the entire essay it can be mentioned that MacDonald was a radical and he criticized the present literature. He was to some extent correct but all his arguments were not correct. The present literature was not completely inadequate as argued by Dwight. It had some relevance to the present readings. It does not justify all the aspects of MacDonald. He was too orthodox and his thoughts were too primitive regarding the present reading. While concluding this can be mentioned that the printing matters leaves a great impact on the reading habit and the thoughts of the readers. The world should move ahead and it should go with the technological advancement. Reference Gear, Adrienne. Reading Power, Revised Expanded Edition: Teaching students to think while they read. Pembroke Publishers Limited, 2015. Hicks, Sylvia, Shane MacDonald, and Ela Martin. "Enhancing scientific literacy by targeting specific scientific skills." Teaching Science: The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association 63.3 (2017). Iyer-O'Sullivan, Radhika. "" I can't say it any better": Critical reading as a threshold concept in helping postgraduate Arab students become critical and original writers." International Journal for economics Integrity 9.2 (2013). Lamb, Danielle, et al. Doing Philosophy: a practical guide for students. AC Black, 2013. LoBiondo-Wood, Geri, Judith Haber, and Cherylyn Cameron. "Critical reading strategies: Overview of the research process." Nursing Research in Canada-E-Book: Methods, Critical Appraisal, and Utilization (2014): 48. MacDonald, Margaret, Magdalena Rudkowski, and Janine Hostettler Schrer. "Lingering Discourses: Jean Jacque Rousseaus 18th-Century Images of Mothers, Fathers, and Children." Journal of Childhood Studies 38.1 (2013): 21. McGillis, Roderick. "Phantastes and Lilith: Femininity and Freedom." The Gold Thread: Essays on George MacDonald (2015): 31-55. Tinning, Richard. "Reading self-study in/for physical education: Revisiting the zeitgeist of reflection." Self-study in psychology education teacher education. Springer International Publishing, 2014. 153-167. Westbrook, Robert. "Dwight Macdonald: Democracy and Discrimination." Raritan 35.1 (2015): 57.